NEW YORK TIMES HUSTLES RIGHT-WING SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEME In a particularly seamy example of the disinformation now rife in the major media, a front-page story in the New York Times pawned off as "bipartisan" a plan to partially dismantle Social Security that is, in fact, the product of a right- wing think tank. Although the Center for Strategic and International Studies put some token conservative Democrats on its National Commission on Retirement Policy, the commission is deeply information social security number information social security number biased towards corporatist and conservative viewpoints. The story headlined "Bipartisan group urges big changes in Social Security" spoke of "powerful interest groups including the American Association of Retired Persons" that oppose the commission's plan to create private investment accounts for retirees. The commission also proposed raising retirement age to 70. The commission claims its scheme would keep Social Security solvent for about 75 years -- ironically the same lifetime Robert Reich estimates for the trust fund simply using michigan job search information social security number by realistic economic growth rates rather than the depression-level ones being cited to encourage the current panic. The true nature of CSIS should be no secret to the Times. Not only has it covered its hyper-hawkish and spook- friendly projects since it was launched in the 1960s, but the paper has been one of the center's donors. CSIS gained notoriety in the Cold War years thanks to its intimate ties with the military and intelligence establishments as well as top ten search engines information social security number its seeming preference for media attention over scholarship. In 1985, for example, CSIS claimed 4,100 media contacts. A year later the Washington Post referred to it as a "conservative propaganda machine." Its associates included the likes of Henry Kissinger, Jeanne Kirkpatrick, former deputy CIA chief Ray Clines, and other macho geo-politicists such as Zbigniew Brzezinski, James Schlesinger, and Arnaud de Borchgrave. The controversial center apparently even became a little too much for its host, Georgetown University and CSIS moved person social security number information social security number to its own
